Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AudioPorn Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AudioPorn Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I agree with both maintenance tags placed on the article. In my humble opinion, this fails both WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. It lacks reliable sources covering AudioPorn in depth; most coverage is trivial and AudioPorn is usually not the main subject of the article. For example this article, which is reliable, only shows a passing mention. This source focuses on the subject but 'Full Effect Promo' is not an independent source as it's a promotional service for record labels. My WP:BEFORE search was just coming up with the usual Soundcloud, Discogs, Instagram, Mixcloud, Databeats etc. which any Joe Bloggs can get coverage on. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2008-06 ✗ A7

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.