Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack on Mette Frederiksen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Mette Frederiksen#Personal life by an abundant unanimous consensus. Discussion closed per WP:SNOW. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attack on Mette Frederiksen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTNEWS. Should be merged into Mette Frederiksen#Personal life and would fit perfectly there. Absolutely no need for a separate article. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Denmark. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — An attack on a current head of government hardly counts as WP:NOTNEWS. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Events. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mette Frederiksen - WP:NOTNEWS, WP:SUSTAINED, take your pick. Yes, an attack on a current head of government can be a notable event, but...
On 7 June 2024, Frederiksen was purportedly shoved by a man in Kultorvet, Copenhagen.
Frederiksen sat down at a café after the attack.
~Adam^{(talk · contribs)} 14:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mette Frederiksen. He wasn't really attacked, he was shoved and the sourcing reflects that. Easily covered in a sentance on the main article. Esolo5002 (talk) 15:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mette Frederiksen - With all information. Clearly created at an early stage, anyways notable but not for a separate article.BabbaQ (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mette Frederiksen per above. Uffda608 (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mette Frederiksen. An egging would be more notable than this, and I doubt this would qualify for WP:10YT. Borgenland (talk) 16:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It slipped my tongue for the past 24 hours but finally, I'm also adding WP:LASTING for merge argument. Borgenland (talk) 15:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mette Frederiksen. Not an attack really.--Catlemur (talk) 17:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mette Frederiksen (where incident is already covered) per above. Økonom (talk) 18:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mette Frederiksen. WP:CRIME and WP:BLPCRIME also apply. A separate Wikipedia article about a crime should not be created when the victim already has a pre-existing article, because they are a notable person for other reasons. Material about a suspect shouldn't be included in an article until a conviction is secured. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 00:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This event isn't notable enough to be remembered for any length of time. She was purely injured. The unknown person at the time of writing possibly never had a plan to use any weapons but to just shove. Unlike the other example in the article such as Fico's attempted assassination being an event likely to be remembered because a politician was injured by firearm by someone who opposed the Prime Minister's policies. 71.223.90.84 (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Buffoons, why would you make an article on a man shoving someone, no matter how important they are. DementiaGaming (talk) 01:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - I agree I was reading the article and thinking that this is too light to be considered attack. What's next, calling an insult an attack on a politician? This is a waste of data. Cganuelas (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. There doesn't seem to be enough relevant information on this to warrant a full article at this time, and from the description of the event, I would suspect very little will be forthcoming. DeemDeem52 (talk) 14:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: this hardly warrants more than a paragraph. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy merge I must yet again ask the article creator not to rush to create single-sentence pages on current events and instead propose a split of the main article when length of material warrants it. Reywas92^Talk 16:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.