Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomic Lullabies - Very Best of The Blow Monkeys
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Atomic Lullabies - Very Best of The Blow Monkeys[edit]
- Atomic Lullabies - Very Best of The Blow Monkeys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
i can't find significant coverage for this album. Joe Chill (talk) 00:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:11, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Relisted again as no discussion on-going. JForget 22:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I also found nothing on this album in the usual databases, and nothing on google except for the fact that it exists. Trimming POrV and sourcing from the album's own liner notes (written by band member) would leave little beside a release date and track listing. Even Dr. Robert's Offical Website (the only external link provided at current time) does not list the album as part of the Blow Monkeys' discography. Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.