Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomic Hooligan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atomic Hooligan[edit]

These guys have 100k ghits, which is a lot, but the article is a total mess and doesn't make the notability clear, and doesn't cite refs. Maybe I'm in a deletionist mood; I could be convinced that cleanup is a viable option. YechielMan 23:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, perhaps completely rewrite it. The article is a mess as is, but they've got numerous bios and reviews: [1][2][3][4][5] - probably sufficient for an articleEMP 00:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: Seems to be notable, but this article needs to be trashed and restarted. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - this band had a top ten album in Japan, won best album at the Breakspoll awards, came 7th in DJ magazine's album of the year award, played Glastonbury - why has this ever been AfD'd? - iridescenti (talk to me!) 01:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Clearly notable based on the discussion here, but I doubt the article would be of use in any rewriting efforts. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.