Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atma Global

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "delete" arguments are based on Wikipedia guidelines, while the "keep" ones aren't. For example, copies of publications existing in libraries do not make even those publications notable, let alone subjects one step away, such as the publishers of those publications. Likewise for the other "keep" reasons. JBW (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Atma Global[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Atma Global (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company doesn't pass WP:ORG; WP:GNG; was declined G7 because they have won an award. A bronze 'Stevie' (one of a very large number awarded) apart, there is zero notability on offer here. In the first 4 sources given in the article, the company isn't even mentioned in 3 of 'em... Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A BEFORE shows no coverage outside of the Stevie award and the coverage is not significant. JBchrch talk 15:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I think company pass WP:ORG; WP:GNG (Examples of substantial coverage: A scholarly article, a book passage, or ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization)

List of released tutorials and their availability in libraries around the world: [1] (416 works in 526 publications in 1 language and 53,185 library holdings) For example: available in the F.D. Bluford Library [2], Arkansas Tech University [3], The Chinese University of Hong Kong Library [4] and “Cultural Globalization A Bibliography” Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies in Iran: [5] S0merkile (talk) 14:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-no2008181209/
  2. ^ http://www.library.ncat.edu/dbm/dbi
  3. ^ https://libguides.atu.edu/HR/videos
  4. ^ https://www.lib.cuhk.edu.hk/uclib/html/featurelist/uceduhb.html
  5. ^ http://www.ihcs.ac.ir/grids/168/109/filesFolder/ghanbari/CULTURAL%20GLOBAL%20BOOKS%20%20JOURNAL% 20ARTICLES.pdf
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I google subject's products (e.g. CultureQuest) - it looks like they used in university courses (in Additional References): One and Two Plus I found some tutorial references Also there are many small publishers on Wikipedia, for example Bento Books and Dunedin Academic Press Ftopay (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing the notability of the company. P:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Pointing out that some of the products are listed in libraries is not one of the criteria for notability. Topic company fails our WP:NCORP criteria. HighKing++ 12:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Run n Fly (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Peter303x (talk) 00:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Atma_Global&oldid=1030865293"