Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atle Antonsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Obviously notable, non-admin closure. MrPrada (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Atle Antonsen

Atle Antonsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

completely unsourced original research, not verified, does not establish notability, no citations nor external links NewAtThis (talk) 00:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep We have an {{unreferenced}} tag for these situations. Subject has an article in the Norwegian Wikipedia and IMDB, needs some references, but obviously not "completely unsourced original research". --Canley (talk) 00:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

without any sources this could be a hoax, its nothing but original research at this point IMHONewAtThis (talk) 03:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep, yet another disruptive nom. There is RS Coverage, in addition to what Canley mentioned above TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 03:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep Clearly notable and I have added sources. Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 04:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep Notable and real sources. Aokaado (talk) 05:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.