Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlag United Methodist Church
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Atlag United Methodist Church[edit]
- Atlag United Methodist Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable church. In addition, the page which I reverted was designed to look like the church's personal website, and not like an encyclopedia article. Corvus cornixtalk 22:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom Tiggerjay (talk) 23:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Didn't I just !vote to delete this a couple of weeks ago? Ah yes, here it is; I even recognize the picture. Now, does this qualify as a G4 speedy, or will I have to reiterate that this church is no more notable than the next? AnturiaethwrTalk 23:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think we can't speedy this one. If I remember it right, the new article is not a duplicate of the old one.--Lenticel (talk) 23:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah well, such is life. Still, I think it's similar enough that the comments from the last time apply to this one as well. AnturiaethwrTalk 00:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --ShakataGaNai Talk 23:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete (G4) as per Anturiaethwr. Horologium (talk) 23:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my comments of the last afd and my analysis of the references below:
- References 1 and 2 are only directories and does not give much detail about the church.
- Reference 3 is a multiply site, need I say more?
- References 4 and 5 are the strongest but they do not give any history regarding the church or its notabililty. no. 4 simply states that the church is given a mention in one of the speeches but there are no elaborations regarding that matter anywhere else in the webpage. No. 5 might give the possibility of notability since an annual congregation meet was held in Atlag. However, it does not clearly state that the meeting is held in the church, only the baranggay.--Lenticel (talk) 23:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, local churches are not inherently notable. KleenupKrew (talk) 11:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 01:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.