Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlético

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlético[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ARTIST. Cannot find any mention of this group anywhere in any language. Rogermx (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the article is in bad shape, seeing as it does not mention any sources. The group does seem real, per this UNAM/MUAC museum listing. Research in Spanish would be helpful for finding sources. I saw this in Spanish, and the Spanish Wikipedia article has ten sources that are worth investigating. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Spanish version has some citations. Some dead links though. Worth checking perhaps? Vexations (talk) 21:53, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A Mexican art collective of 20 years ago. The OP looks to be a responsible editor, mostly about football, so no obvious evidence of self-promotion or COI. I went through all the Spanish-language article's links, predisposed to discover something marvelous about Mexican art collectives of 20 years ago. But then the projects sound gassy. "The first pieces they made were a series of postcards sent by email with photos of the members and funny or ironic phrases about their private characters, then they continued this practice with stickers that were suddenly distributed." The sources are no better. The linked biography of one member (es:Dulce Chacón (ilustradora)) doesn't even mention or link back to Atlético. There's no visible lasting influence, or sustained careers, or connection to other collectives, or place within any larger aesthetic scene or cultural moment. I wanted it to be notable. --Lockley (talk) 08:36, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'll agree with Lockley's analysis. Not much to be found here. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 11:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article has no sourcing, and after an online search, I could not find anything to add to it in the way of sourcing or in depth coverage. Does not pass GNG or NARTIST guidelines. Netherzone (talk) 19:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.