Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atal Indian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:24, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Atal Indian[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of Atal Indian. Not independently notable. Rathfelder (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I accidentally tagged the wrong article. I meant to nominate Atal Vatika. Rathfelder (talk) 07:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NGO and WP:GNG I am taking the nom for this AfD. a Tree planting campaign, started by an actor has only received interview like WP:INHERITED coverage. Its website says, [1]Atal Indian has been conceptualized by Nitin Sahrawat, as part of his social outreach efforts.. This is a minor 2 para coverage. This is coverage of the actor mostly. This is an interview and not Independent coverage. The content at Nitin_Sahrawat#Social_causes is enough for this sort of coverage. --DBig Xrayᗙ 12:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As mentioned by Rathfelder, this article was mistakenly tagged for deletion. I personally feel that more articles related to environment conservation projects should be included on Wikipedia.The Seeker Syndrome (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: The Seeker Syndrome (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

Hi Author of this article, since I have taken up the nomination, it does not matter anymore that the tagger now disagreed with his nomination. If you have any Policy based justification please provide, merely stating WP:ILIKEIT would not help in your cause.--DBig Xrayᗙ 10:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I overlooked WP:AVOIDCOI, my bad. Also, thanks for the advice to avoid WP:ILIKEIT. I would suggest that the coverage provided is sufficient to establish the notability of Atal Indian The Seeker Syndrome (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage Atal Indian has got is WP:INHERITED (i.e. coverage is mainly due to the actor) nor is the coverage WP:SIGCOV.--DBig Xrayᗙ 11:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 00:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If someone wants to keep either article we need coverage about the organisation and its activities, not just about Nitin Sahrawat.Rathfelder (talk) 07:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per DBigXRay. Absent SIGCOV, a standalone article isn't any merited.∯WBG^converse 20:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing to justify a stand-alone article Spiderone 09:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.