Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At-Tahur Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

At-Tahur Limited

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

At-Tahur Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

• Comment It fails WP:CORPDEPTH, but has minor coverage. Mosaicberry (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

References

• Keep - The company and its products have had coverage, though not to the extent mentioned in WP:CORPDEPTH. Plus the company is listed on the country's only stock exchange; that goes towards having notability. - Wiki.0hlic ^(talk) 18:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
• Keep. If listed on the stock exchange and also has notable media coverage, it's notable (per WP:LISTED). A Google search shows that the company has notable coverage. Not a small mom-and-pop business either as the revenue shows. — Stevey7788 (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

• Keep for barely passing WP:GNG.  samee  converse  08:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.