Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asurankundu Dam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 11:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Asurankundu Dam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor geographical feature failing WP:GEOFEAT. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:25, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:25, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:25, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The dam and associated reservoir are clearly a significant geographic feature in the landscape. It is similar in size to Toddbrook Reservoir, and we shouldn't forgo an article on it simply because sources are harder to come by, per WP:WORLDVIEW.----Pontificalibus 10:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is a combo article about a dam and reservoir and forest and recreation area, and as noted in the article it can potentially become a bigger tourist attraction. See really excellent essay wp:ITSATOURISTATTRACTION. Could/should be developed more about the latter aspects, and perhaps eventually moved to a broader title such as "Asurankundu Dam and Recreation Area" or whatever term properly describes it in larger terms. As Pontificalibus notes, just covering the dam and reservoir suffices already. --Doncram (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GEOFEAT and WP:ITSATOURISTATTRACTION. -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 04:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.