Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrovamps

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 18:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Astrovamps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, appears to fail WP:BAND. I can't find any significant coverage. Lennart97 (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:29, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Google search does not turn up reliable sources that are independent of the subject and talk about the subject in depth. The only hits on Google are from self-published and user-generated sites such are Discogs, Facebook, and Spotify. The recordings have not charted on national music charts or have received any certifications or accolades. The record label is not a major one. --Ashleyyoursmile! 16:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.