Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astros Gunnarsdottir
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Astros Gunnarsdottir[edit]
- Astros Gunnarsdottir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find no references, or news sources, just wikis and facebook and other directories. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:43, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unsourced BLP. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 17:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - not completely unsourceable, see this one, and this other one, but close to it. Bearian (talk) 19:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: A one line credit and a sentence saying she got a Masters degree. This doesn't come close to satisfying WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:CREATIVE. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Meets neither the GNG or the relevant SNGs, as per nom. I repeated my own searches and came up with essentially the same sources as Bearian. --j⚛e deckertalk 18:24, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:V and all notability criteria. Given the assertions made in the article she certainly sounds notable, however I could find no sources in any language to verify the claims. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 19:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.