Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrological transit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. STANDARD DISCLAIMER: THIS DEFAULTS TO KEEP; DO NOT CITE THIS ALONE AS A REASON TO SUPPORT/OPPOSE A MERGE/REDIRECT/WHATEVER. On another note, will those who suggested a cleanup please do this themselves? Johnleemk | Talk 15:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Astrological transit

Essay treating astrology as a fact, ending "Please write here your experiences with transits". WP:NOR as well as WP:NOT a web forum. Delete Kusma (討論) 18:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Irredeemably non-encyclopedic. Ruby 18:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Might have some value if cleaned up and placed in context of astrology. (aeropagitica) 18:51, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - Definitely has some value. Needs to be cleaned up a lot to make it more objective. The "Please write here your experiences with transits" part is totally insipid and has to go. This subject is totally valid as an occult related subject. - Nortonew 19:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A totally unencyclopedic and POV chunk of original research. Alternatively, redirect to Astrology. MCB 03:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, rephrase for neutrality and put in context. "In astrology, it is believed that..." We document all sorts of less-common religious beliefs, why should this sort of thing be any different? -- Jake 00:42, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.