Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrogator
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Navigator#In science fiction. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Astrogator[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Astrogator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional term. Might belong in wiktionary but it fails at being an encyclopedic article due to failures of WP:GNG. Sure, it is used in a number of works, but outside making a "list of books and other media that use the term astrogator" there is is little to work with, and such a list would fail WP:LISTN anyway. I am not sure if there is any valid redirect target (Interstellar travel#In fiction?) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge An astrogator does not necessarily involve interstellar travel, but Technology in science fiction#Spaceflight could be an adequate merge target. That article needs some heavy cleanup.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge to navigator as a better(?) fit than the other two redirect targets suggested. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- You're right, that is better. I have created a section at Navigator#In science fiction as a merge target that can be used.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect - Currently just a dictionary term without analysis. Redirecting to the above seems fine. TTN (talk) 12:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Navigator#In science fiction sounds fine. – sgeureka t•c 13:11, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Navigator#In science fiction - although I remember reading those stories in Campbell's anthologies which were later published by the SFBC. And Starman Jones sits on my nightstand, don't know how many times I've re-read that. Onel5969 TT me 15:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.