Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astaire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and withdraw nom, per WP:SNOW. Move if you want. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Astaire

Quite simply, there is nothing here that needs to be disambiguated in this way. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there isn't? It looks valid to me. --Haemo 01:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I'm reasonably certain - to the point that I think it could be G6'd, but I thought I'd go for concensus. See, I see Fred and Adele, but that I see, they're never referred to by their last name only when referenced, without context; Astaire, the stockbroking company, is redlinked, and possibly with good reason; Blondfire, while previously known as Astaire, needed to rename, so that might be questionable. that leaves Astair Airlines - one link. I'll hedge to concensus, but that's my story and I'ma gonna stick to it. =^_^= --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. JJL 02:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep. You bring up some valid points Dennis, but there's just barely enough need for this page that it ought to be kept. Groupthink 02:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's enough here and we've got room. I'm visualizing a user who remembers some balding guy who can dance a little named Astaire... Clarityfiend 02:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Clarityfiend, but I can also imagine someone who used to like the band Blondfire before it changed its name, and wants to look it up. Having the disambig page would I think be appropriate. --Charlene 04:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - while I don't think it's incredibly likely that someone will type in "Astaire" as a search term, the possiblitiy exists and disambig pages are cheap. No real reason to delete this. Otto4711 06:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Move to Astaire (disambiguation) and Astaire to redirect to Fred Astaire. Magioladitis 07:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely the latter, that's an ideal solution. Groupthink 07:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Astaire (disambiguation) per Magioladitis and Groupthink. —gorgan_almighty 10:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no reason to delete.IP198 14:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I don't see a problem with it. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 14:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move per above. your ordinary run-of-the-mill disambiguation page. ~ Infrangible 02:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, consensus says keep. I'm gonna hedge to that per WP:SNOW and withdraw my nom. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.