Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Scientists, Developers and Faculties (2nd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 April 24.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 17:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Association of Scientists, Developers and Faculties[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As with the previously deleted version of this article, there is no indication of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject or other criteria for notability of organizations. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ningauble (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ningauble (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is not clear that the organization is even functioning anymore. All the website links are dead and there doesn't seem to be a new website. The journal links are live but nothing seems to have been published. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The organization does run meetings as listed at a meeting organizer's website. No coverage by reliable secondary sources. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see no better improvement. Pinging Gigs, Ukexpat and Kinu. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the sources are dead links, can be re initiated after rewriting the article. Wikienglish123 (talk) 16:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[Revert as per WP:BLOCKEVASION using strikethrough font. 00:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)]

Delete - no evidence of notability on any of the search engines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.