Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assembly of Yahweh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sacred Name Movement. I will leave it up to whoever does the merge to figure out which, and how much, material should be moved. In any case, leave a redirect behind. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assembly of Yahweh[edit]

Assembly of Yahweh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and may simply be best known through the Sacred Name Movement and in that case should simply be mentioned there (which it is but can maybe be expanded a little more) because my searches simply found nothing better than here and here and this hasn't changed much since starting in July 2008. Pinging author Johnpacklambert. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Repeatedly mentioned in encyclopedias of religion, new religious movements, and the like. It therefore makes sense that it has an encyclopedia entry here.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.