Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AssaultCube Reloaded

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AssaultCube Reloaded[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was speedied as the game is allegedly breaching the original rights but non of the content was a copyvio and that interpretation for a speedy didn't gain traction at the DRV discussion. Despite that, this is clearly something that is unsourced and doesn't, on the face of it, meet our inclusion criteria so I am listing this for discussion per the DRV. As I a procedural listing connected to the DRV close I make no personal recommendation. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet the GNG. I could not find any independent references for the game. --Odie5533 (talk) 14:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could not find any references either. Jucchan (talk) 22:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, no reliable sources. Yet another of a zillion freeware games out there. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only refs provided are download and developer's sites - no 3rd party reliable sources to establish notability; created by a now-banned SPA as likely spam/promotional. Dialectric (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - spectacularly fails WP:GNG, no third party sources evidencing notability. ukexpat (talk) 16:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.