Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassinorum: Execution Force

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Warhammer 40,000#Spin-offs and related fiction. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 05:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assassinorum: Execution Force[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability for this. No references, and all searches reveal only sales sites and niche market reviews. Nothing independent and nothing robust. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (well, smerge) to Warhammer 40,000#Spin-offs and related fiction (and, as an aside, I'd subdivide that section). 40K is a huge franchise with 30 years of a history. In addition to the core miniature wargame, there are about eleventy-seven spin-off games and standalone products set in the same universe. This is one of them. It has... dubious available sources on its own merits, but deserves at least inclusion in the embedded list of related products in the parent article. For what it's worth, there are at least a couple sources that are absolutely "niche" reviews, but that claim to have some form of editorial control. Places like Bell of Lost Souls, The Dice Tower, and Diehard GameFan (here reviewing the novelization of this game... because rabbit holes are for going down). No, these aren't the sort of "high quality" sources that get you a passing grade at FAC, but there's no reason they shouldn't suffice for inclusion of a line or two of information about this product (and the spinoff spinoff book!) in a wider-topic article. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 04:07, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pretty non-notable one-off boxed game by GW, and the article reads like a bad copy/paste from the GW advert for it.194.28.127.55 (talk) 02:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge as per Squeamish Ossifrage. BOZ (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Warhammer 40,000. Lack of significant coverage in independent sources. --Bejnar (talk) 03:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.