Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspseek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:53, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aspseek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a search engine that does not have significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Searching turns up some mentions in books, but none of it goes beyond that. Whpq (talk) 11:08, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. - a boat that can float! (watch me float) 13:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. - a boat that can float! (watch me float) 13:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It seems this product has been discontinued and typing aspseek.org redirects to parallels.com (the parent company). A Google News archives search provided nothing useful, minor mentions here and here and a listing through Kir Kolyshkin's (software's lead developer) blog. Google News archives also provided non-English results (bottom of the page and continuing at the second page and briefly third page) but from what I see, they're probably minor mentions. My own search provided a .doc link (www. edseek.org/ docs/ ASPseek-installation .doc, remove spaces to visit) with instructions how to install ASPseek. As noted by the nominator, Google Books provides mostly small mentions including this listing which cites a code.google.com link (http://code.google.com/p/crawler4j/) and another result here. SwisterTwister talk 20:54, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.