Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspects of Uranus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Aspects of Uranus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Improperly application of AfD template redirected to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspects of Pluto. My preference is to transwiki to an appropriate site. RJH (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. There are number of minor planet pages where this (aspect) information is included in the content, but I don't think it's an appropriate location. So, depending on the consensus here, I'd like to act on the minor planet aspect data accordingly. Thanks. — RJH (talk)
- Speedy close this should be WP:BUNDLEd to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspects of Mars. Potatoswatter 18:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - can't bundle, there are !votes there already. --Dennisthe2 19:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What is a "!vote"? Nothing is there besides the nomination, which does not count as a vote, and my comments that it should be closed with no further discussion, which also do not contain a vote. Potatoswatter 23:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A !vote is, for lack of a better term, a vote - but not. See, since this process is not actually a vote, per se, but a discussion to reach a concensus, anything cast isn't a vote. It's called a "!vote" because the exclamation point prefixing it, in this context, means "not" - and aside from looking fairly clever, it also is easier to type "!vote" than "not vote". See this link for a better explanation of the usage as a negative boolean operator. --Dennisthe2 02:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatever. At the time only the nominator and myself had weighed in. My point stands. Anyway that AfD can serve for this article even if nobody takes the initiative to bundle. Potatoswatter 03:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A !vote is, for lack of a better term, a vote - but not. See, since this process is not actually a vote, per se, but a discussion to reach a concensus, anything cast isn't a vote. It's called a "!vote" because the exclamation point prefixing it, in this context, means "not" - and aside from looking fairly clever, it also is easier to type "!vote" than "not vote". See this link for a better explanation of the usage as a negative boolean operator. --Dennisthe2 02:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Either way, per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspects of Pluto as referenced from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspects of Mars, this AfD is improper and should be speedy closed one way or the other. Potatoswatter 23:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What is a "!vote"? Nothing is there besides the nomination, which does not count as a vote, and my comments that it should be closed with no further discussion, which also do not contain a vote. Potatoswatter 23:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - can't bundle, there are !votes there already. --Dennisthe2 19:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The link from aspects of Uranus to this page was broken until now; I just fixed it. Potatoswatter 16:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.