Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashraf Shad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ashraf Shad[edit]

Ashraf Shad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage found. Fails WP:NWRITER and WP:GNG. Started by SPA User:Ftmshad. Greenbörg (talk) 07:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete for the reasons presented by Greenbörg. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 07:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep this source says "Novelist, poet, journalist and playwright Ashraf Shad has a very impressive portfolio of writings to his name." but apparently none of subject's work/book is notable so i would go with week keep. --Saqib (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.