Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Redmond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Redmond[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7 quality article that has no coverage in reliable sources and makes no claim to significance. I am taking to AfD to sort out if this should be redirected. She has a notable grandfather and great-grandfather, but neither of these is near close enough a connection to be worth a redirect, and even if they were. I also strongly believe that living people should not be directed to other biographies generally, since they have no control over the content of the other biography, though that's lessened in this case since both of the possible targets are dead. Ultimately, redirecting serves no purpose here and there are valid reasons to delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:09, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:09, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the claim about her grandfather appears to be unsourced, and is irrelevant in any case. The references appear to be mainly trivial mentions of her in the context of magazine pieces on her clients. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails GNG. Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.