Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Pangborn
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ashley Pangborn[edit]
- Ashley Pangborn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
CSD prior due to notability issues. Here again with essentially same concerns, though I figured I'd put it up to community debate this time around. NJA (t/c) 11:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No significant coverage indicating notability among manufacturers of bass guitars. The article doesn't meet the notability criteria.--Vejvančický (talk) 12:35, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In what publications do notable manufacturers of bass guitars appear? The Blue Book of Electric Guitars is a possibility, and Pangborn is there along with a hundred others. What other sources are there? I suppose that The electric guitar: a history of an American icon by A. J. Millard wouldn't work too well for a British manufacturer. Maybe the Electric guitar handbook by Alan Ratcliffe published in London in 2005. Can anybody get a copy? There is one at the Los Angeles Public Library. --Bejnar (talk) 06:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 14:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.