Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Long
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ashley Long (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG and as a BLP requires impeccable sourcing. There is nothing here that suggests that sourcing exists. Spartaz Humbug! 16:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 16:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete — Subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources to justify retaining the article as of now. Celestina007 (talk) 23:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.