Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashleigh of Clifton, Clifton, Virginia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleigh of Clifton, Clifton, Virginia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable residential subdivision. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually a Delete, Delete A 21-home subdivision built in the 1980s? In a town that has 185 people? Egad. Mandsford (talk) 03:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @250 · 04:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My street has far more than 21 houses in it, but I would not dream of suggesting it is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Unless someone can come up with remarkable special reasons for notability this is an obvious deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If there were some controversy about the development of the subdivision (land-use issues, notable litigation, scandal), then an article about that event would be appropriate - in which case this would be merged over. A mention on the town's article might not be a bad idea, since this is over 10% of their population (probably more). But, otherwise, this article doesn't meet notability. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.