Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish shantilal kansara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish shantilal kansara

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and lacks significant coverage. Mvqr (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Gujarat. Mvqr (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~:Keep~~
~~he is only one artist who doing Indian god's Rogan painting.~~

~~I support him Koshish1917 (talk) 08:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)~~ [reply]
Delete for promo and unsourced. I can't find anything about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 13:19, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Beacase this artisan very poor and uneducated so he has only worked for livelihood. But he is traditional Rogan artist Professorofcraft (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So they aren't notable then, thank you for clarifying. If they haven't had coverage in any reliable sources, we can't keep the article. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional or backlink article. Non-notable. ImperialMajority (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC) [reply]
this not for promo. he is real artist Professorofcraft (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
you're a sock apparently, we can't take that answer. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak Keep~~ – The sources in the article are mostly youtube videos, but most of the videos are recordings of seemingly reliable news channels (News18, VTV News, Odisha TV, Gujarat First News) with reports focussed on Kansara. Certainly not true that nothing can be found on this artist, as a comment above suggests. small jars tc 15:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC) The sock-ness of this situation has removed my confidence in my !vote. small jars tc 15:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
rogan art is rare and vanshing art, ashish kansara doing this, please keep support Professorofcraft (talk) 17:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is beautiful and perfect, well done man 👍 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:1EB0:4CBA:396B:71A9:74CE:4814 (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

keep beacase it not promotional, he poor rogan art artist, keep supporting for art lover Professorofcraft (talk) 17:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:N, or at least WP:GNG: the problem is not whether the artist is real, or whether we should feel sympathy for him, but mostly whether there are reliable sources that focus on him. Also, please avoid bludgeoning the discussion. small jars tc 23:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I find no sources for the biographical information presented. A fair amount of this article is about Rogan painting, already covered in a much better article. There are way too many embedded links. I will be removing many of the embedded links in the body of the article, and move others down to external links, where they belong. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 03:23, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have requested deletion of the two watermarked images in the article.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CU note Gosh, this is a socky discussion. I have struck through two comments above, both by socks of different people. Koshish1917 is the same as ProfessorofCraft above, who shouldn't be making multiple !votes here; ImperialMajority is someone else who shouldn't be here at all. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.