Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Basnet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish Basnet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-created, promotional article that does not meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Only sources are the subject's own blogs/publications etc Melcous (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - no sign of significance/importance, much less of notability. --bonadea contributions talk 13:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 15:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Nothing of value here. —swpb^T 18:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all convincing for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG by a wide margin. Not a single source exists discussing the article subject. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.