Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashfield Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ashfield Mall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. the coverage is very routine or run of the mill, like real estate news or a store opening. at 25,000 square metres this is small by Australian shopping centre standards. LibStar (talk) 01:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Insignificant shopping mall lacking independent coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 03:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MILL and WP:ORG. Small shopping centre with a lack of significant independent sources. Ajf773 (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the comments above. Is there an article to redirect to? MartinJones (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.