Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As the Apple Turns
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As the Apple Turns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
it's not sourced. i tried to find an independent article on the subject, but could only come up with a blog. doesn't satisfy WP:WEB. the_undertow talk 02:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Well... yeah, the problem about finding press sources for AtAT is that it died a long time ago. I know there were storied about in in MacAddict (now MacLife) and MacWorld, as well as MacWEEK (now MacCentral... even later MacWorld). The MacObserver questions about it here... wired asks about it here, the unoffical mac weblog (a real content provider, I'm not even sure it qualifies as a blog itself) here also referencing the wired. While not the article i was looking for (it was much older than this one) but MacWorld (print) has a small blurb here. I dunno. MrMacMan Talk 05:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm gonna go with delete. It closed long ago, and the article is a stub? I doubt it's gonna get better, it's much more likely to go downhill. Hence my vote; just get rid of it now. Doesn't seem overly notable either. ~ G1ggy! ...chatterbox... 10:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you asking for the article to be deleted because it's going to 'go downhill' or because you don't think its notable? I don't think speculation about the future quality of an article is a deletion criteria. MrMacMan Talk 20:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete website promo. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's not a promo- the site died before the article was written. It really was a great site, but not notable enough for WP and there seems to be no chance of it ever becoming more notable than it is now. Sorry Jack, Katie, and Anya- hope all's well. Staecker 12:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.