Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Behll

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Behll

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable actor, largely unsourced, no coverage in reliable sources, autobiography, most of the edits are from a COI editor, basically fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. - Managerarc™^talk 14:41, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While we discourage the autobio and coi editing, that should not be a reason to drag articles to afd. There are other platforms to resolve those issues. As far as notability of subject is concerned, he may meet NACTOR#1 criteria for he seems to have had act of mixed length in multiple notable films and tv shows (refs are cited in article. there are not tons of them, may be because he predominately works in regional film and tv shows and sources in regional languages are not fully digitalised yet and whatsoever are, is not very well indexed by Google.). Anup [Talk] 16:31, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He has had minor roles in several films, but none of them are named roles. He does not meet WP:NACTOR. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment : I want the Article to be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.87.81.114 (talk) 15:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.