Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arturo Licata
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. j⚛e deckertalk 17:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Arturo Licata[edit]
- Arturo Licata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
How is he notable enough to merit his own article? He is one of many living Italians, and not even among the top five oldest men.Ricksantorum2012 (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Because the project has decided that oldest living people is a category that qualifies for articles, I believe that "oldest living man in Europe" is a satisfactory claim to notability. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 4. Snotbot t • c » 03:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Sven and because he has been the subject of several news articles --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 05:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Appears to meet WP:BASIC per [1], [2]. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the above. In this case, precedent and consensus are clear that the oldest living people in particular categories are notable enough for articles, provided of course that sources exist. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:20, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per above; oldest living people are notable enough for articles assuming sufficient sources exist to prove the claim. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 14:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep certainly remarkable. Notability seems to hang on case law about notability--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 15:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. — Joaquin008 (talk) 10:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: If being the oldest living European and Italian man is not notable, then I don't know what is. Futurist110 (talk) 07:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He is the oldest living man in Europe. Old Time Music Fan (talk) 23:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.