Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arturo Alonso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arturo Alonso

Contested prod. Non-notable, unreferenced biography. I have been unable to find any reliable sources or validate any of the claims contained in the article. Millbrooky (talk) 14:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. AKRadecki^Speaketh 14:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability wasn't in question here. If the claims check out, he's clearly notable. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. How is this clearly notable? If there are no references documenting the subject, it sure as hell isn't "clear" to me. JBsupreme (talk) 00:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nor to me--delete. Not-notable, as well as illegible. Drmies (talk) 02:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 03:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Director of a human rights organization sounds notable to me. It's the sources that are the problem. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.