Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artivatic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete: "19 June 2017 Jimfbleak deleted page Artivatic, G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". (non-admin closure) K.e.coffman (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Artivatic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

16 person company. Highly promotional page. New editor. Legacypac (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Transcribed from talk page) "Hi I took information from the internet, articles, websites, news and research papers to write this article. The article is fully written for the purpose of knowledge not for promotion. Please do due diligence for the article before considering to deletion." (unsigned)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising created by an account with no other contributions Special:Contributions/Maex_789. Copy includes "state of the art..." etc. I'll request a speedy delete; let's see if this takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.