Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artisteer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Artisteer[edit]

Artisteer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The current sources do not establish notability. The only two secondary sources I could find were this and this, neither of which are reliable sources. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article was written by a user named "Artisteer", and their only contributions to Wikipedia were on this article. There may be a WP: COI, but given that their last edits were many years ago, I'm not sure what can be done about that now. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I can only find some software blogs saying it was abandoned about 10 yrs ago, then this [1], neither of which is RS. I don't see any reliable sources we'd use. Oaktree b (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.