Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of generation I Pokémon. ✗plicit 12:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articuno, Zapdos, and Moltres[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

And here, three Pokemons in one entry. All fail GNG, coverage is WP:SIGCOV failing mentions in passing. Another case of "at best, redirect to List of generation I Pokémon". _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. I also support changing the redirect target of Furiizaa to Frieza. Link20XX (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. Literally fails WP:Pokemon Test. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per reason above. 180.194.151.145 (talk) 09:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom and the reasons above. I am slightly surprised that more coverage of these Pokémon do not exist since they are the first legendary Pokémon introduced in the games. I do not see evidence of significant coverage, but I think this a plausible search term so that would seem preferable over out-right deletion. Aoba47 (talk) 03:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, ensuring that they're redirected separately as Articuno and Zapdos and Moltres, rather than as a collected. — ImaginesTigers (talk∙contribs) 01:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.