Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur ap Gwynn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 07:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur ap Gwynn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about his career as a librarian like every librarian of the world. Can't see anything about his notability.

The user randomly creates article using the same source of Dictionary of Welsh biography. Some of the articles look notable, some doesn't. --Captain Spark (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 09:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 09:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dictionary of Welsh Biography will be biased towards people from Welsh. The article must explain why he is notable other than being a plain librarian. Captain Spark (talk) 00:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.