Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Powell Davies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Monty ₈₄₅ 02:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Powell Davies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability, no citations whatsoever, one of the subject's own publications are cited in the references section. —James ^{(Talk • Contribs)} • 2:18pm • 04:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the article wasn't what I expected to see when I read this nomination. In fact it has quite an extensive list of bibliographical references which are about, not published, by the author; George N. Marshall, A. Powell Davies and His Times (1990) and The Mind and Faith of A. Powell Davies, edited by William O. Douglas (1959) for example. Yes, it needs more inline references, but this almost certainly passes WP:N and WP:CLERGY. All of the stuff about McCarthyism is quite interesting, and there are evidently books about that available. If a minister who died in 1957 was thought noteworthy enough for an article by a modern Wikipedian, that must be testament to something. Bob talk 08:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, yeah, I don't really understand this nomination. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.