Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Iberall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Excellent keep argument evidencing that the subject meets a SNG. I considers relisting as this is unsourced but there is no evidence in the nomination that a through search for sources failed to turn any up. If you nominate an article for deletion its best practise to look for sources before running the AFD, Spartaz Humbug! 04:49, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Arthur Iberall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources. Notability unverified. Jojalozzo 23:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Meets WP:PROF criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). Has an h-index of 14 based on a GS analysis, which itself would call for a keep. But most importantly, is a co-author on the 1978 article “Homeokinetics: A Physical Science for Complex Systems”, which seems like a seminal article on homeokinets; this may actually be the founding article on the topic. The term “homeokinetics” itself has over 7,500 citations on GS.--Eric Yurken (talk) 20:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.