Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthrobacter luteus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Although currently unsourced, being a valid species means that there exist reliable sources. Randykitty (talk) 13:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arthrobacter luteus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As non-notable. Cheers, Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 16:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article is an unsourced stub, but the academic literature shows it is very notable. I remind the nominator of WP:BEFORE.--cyclopia ^speak! 09:41, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject is notable. See WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. Plantdrew (talk) 17:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.