Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artefact Heritage Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted per CSD G11. Nick-D (talk) 04:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Artefact Heritage Services[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

G11 borderline promotional article for a non notable organization that lacks coverage in any reliable source. A before search literally almost turns up empty. A few hits on their social media sites & other user generated sources. Overall this is blatant WP:ORG fail. Celestina007 (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 15:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I also couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources. The sources currently cited in the article are all very insubstantial passing mentions, and the only independent, secondary one ([1]) doesn't seem to mention the company at all. – Joe (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.