Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aron Anazia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aron Anazia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. All sources are written by subject. All meaningful contributions to page made by SPAs. —Laoris (talk) 14:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The three sources are all repostings of Anazia telling his story. Nothing indicates that his independent film is at all notable, and until I edited this article it had horrible over name dropping. It still goes into way more detail than justified, which seems to be saying anything about this throughly unnotable performer. The last nomination closed as no consensus because no one made any comments, but it probably should have been closed as a soft delete. The problems brought up there still exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 04:41, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete references currently listed within the article do not convey notability. WP:GNG and WP:BIO do not appear to be met with the current references. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.