Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Agee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Agee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR Dougweller (talk) 10:00, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. No major roles - almost always uncredited. No major awards. No evidence of substantial coverage in reliable sources. No evidence that he's particularly respected or highly regarded or innovative as an actor. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lots of Google hits on name, the only one that is this guy is IMdB, which is not WP:RS. Fails WP:BLP policy for referencing as well as WP:NACTOR. Gtwfan52 (talk) 17:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all roles being uncredited fails WP:ENT. Lack of coverage in reliable sources fails WP:GNG. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 11:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet our N requirements.--Epeefleche (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:SIGCOV to warrant a standalone article and does not meet WP:NACTOR. It largely seeks inherent notability because he's had limited roles in movies where a notable actor has had a leading role. Mkdw ^talk 22:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.