Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arne Senstad
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. I'm just going to say that neither side gave compelling, policy-based arguments. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Arne Senstad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just being a coach is not enough. Slatersteven (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, invalid reason given for the desired deletion. Geschichte (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is all they seem to be notable for, What else dose the article say about them? They are Norwegian, again this is not a reason for them to be notable.Slatersteven (talk) 07:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete no demonstration of notability in article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, He's a coach of a handball national team, because of this he's notable. Additionally he was coach of an elite club team. --Malo95 (talk) 18:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't know how much weight IP views carry but, FWIW, this is a clear fail of WP:BIO lacking the substantial multiple coverage in reliable sources required. The first 'Keep', above, is invalid as it gives no justification for keeping and the second 'keep' is just plain wrong. There is nothing in WP:NSPORTS that says that a coach of a handball national team is inherently notable. 2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0 (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I did a little research about him and after this it's clear for me that he's notable. He played professional handball in Norway and Switzerland, was in the national team and coached professional teams. Furthermore there are news coverage about him in Norway, Poland, Switzerland and Germany.--Malo95 (talk) 13:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't seem notable for inclusion in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zinzhanglee (talk • contribs) 15:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Zinzhanglee: Why? Please can you sare your reasons? And not only say no. --Malo95 (talk) 08:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete My lack of Norwegian and Polish language skills caused me to need computer translations. I did get a lot of ghits, but the translations all seemed to be either typical sports reporting or about his becoming the head coach of the Polish women's national handball team. I don't see anything as a player or coach that would show he meets WP:NSPORT and I would deem the coverage of his becoming Poland's head coach as WP:BLP1E. I might feel differently if he had played or coached at the world championships or Olympics. If someone can provide some other significant coverage I would consider changing my vote. Papaursa (talk) 04:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.