Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army of Two (series)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. NorthAmerica1000 23:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Army of Two (series)[edit]
- Army of Two (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I feel like this doesn't qualify to have it's own page. Each game has it's own page and I don't see the point of having this as a "series" page. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:50, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
DeleteWeak Keep There are at least a couple of articles about the series as a whole ([1], [2]) but nothing that couldn't be covered in individual games' articles. Three games doth not a series make. Sam Walton (talk) 01:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- I hate to "other stuff" but there's a LOT of three game series articles, and even some two game series. This one is definitely in poor shape, but AFD isn't cleanup. I'd say that some of the content of the game articles could be moved to series, for example, the first game's article mentions a graphic novel and film that aren't directly part of the game itself. I also see there's a comic series from IDW[3]. A series article often is used to tie all these disparate items together. I'm not saying it should survive AFD, per say, just picking a few details out. -- ferret (talk) 02:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- I have to agree. I may be in favor of deleting these articles when there's only 2 games, or one title and an announced sequel...but three like this is definitely forming into a series. Seems like it could just be fixed up... Sergecross73 msg me 17:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm slightly swayed after seeing the comic series, and I found that there's a possible movie in the works too. As such I'm a weak keep for now, a series article isn't hurting anyone I guess. Sam Walton (talk) 19:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- I have to agree. I may be in favor of deleting these articles when there's only 2 games, or one title and an announced sequel...but three like this is definitely forming into a series. Seems like it could just be fixed up... Sergecross73 msg me 17:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- I hate to "other stuff" but there's a LOT of three game series articles, and even some two game series. This one is definitely in poor shape, but AFD isn't cleanup. I'd say that some of the content of the game articles could be moved to series, for example, the first game's article mentions a graphic novel and film that aren't directly part of the game itself. I also see there's a comic series from IDW[3]. A series article often is used to tie all these disparate items together. I'm not saying it should survive AFD, per say, just picking a few details out. -- ferret (talk) 02:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - per WP:NOTCLEANUP. With three game titles, and further media ventures as well, there's enough here for an article. Someone just needs to do a way better job at it... Sergecross73 msg me 19:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Per my comments above ans Sergecross. -- ferret (talk) 20:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.