Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenia-Montenegro relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia-Montenegro relations[edit]

Armenia-Montenegro relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. there is very little to these relations, trade is miniscule at USD3.5 million. and there is no evidence of significant relations between these 2 countries. LibStar (talk) 06:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not enough content to justify an article, fails WP:GNG. QueenCake (talk) 21:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Article needs to be expanded, not deleted. Currently passes as a stub that could be given a template to expand. --Steverci (talk) 01:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
you have presented no argument to how the article meets notability guidelines. LibStar (talk) 11:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.