Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armand Navabi (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Armand Navabi[edit]

Armand Navabi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't really seem notable. Being mentioned in an article or two shouldn't automatically mean they're notable. The only media coverage of him is the two linked in the article. Frood 01:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article is well written and is definitely not spam but I agree that Armand is not really notable, which doesn't mean the article should be deleted. The reference to this article in Nerdcore could, however, but I don't think it should either. --Slpk (talk) 14:40, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero | My Talk 07:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete he's co contributed a few books but don't see enough to meet WP:AUTHOR. LibStar (talk) 00:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.