Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armand Deluxe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 18:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Armand Deluxe

Fails WP:MUSIC; non-notable DJ. Claim of a hit song is unverifiable. Jfire (talk) 17:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A Google search reveals lots of hits for this guy. His remixes may be notable, but the article does need verifiable citations. Dgf32 (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —αlεx•mullεr 00:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm likewise getting a fair number of hits, but none that appear notable. For someone that reputedly hit #1 on the charts of several European countries, I'd expect some more useful documentation and less irrelevant hits. The article is written with a promotional tone and does not back up claims to notability with reliable sources, which are proving very difficult to find. If someone is able to pull some out from a search, please message me with the search string you used. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The problem is the lack of a record contract or lack of a charting song by definable label. As such, although he may be a hit in the clubs, may be a favorite of disco dancers, we don't have any product whose progress we can track. Further, the article establishes little context and ends up with "DJ of the future." Well, that's a cry for an article of the future. Utgard Loki (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.