Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arma Shahidi Fitzgerald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 08:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arma Shahidi Fitzgerald

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:BIO, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, asserts only that subject was winner of competition with unspecified notability. Prod contested by creator. MuffledThud (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^SPEAK!! 20:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kevin (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I deleted this as uncontested, later this was contested on my talk page, hence this relisting. Kevin (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. No relevant GBooks, GNews or GScholar results for "Arma Fitzgerald", "Arma Shahidi Fitzgerald" or "Armaiti Shahidi Fitzgerald". — Rankiri (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Rankiri, I'm not finding any hits on her, Mrs. International, or the Fight Oral Cancer Foundation. I can't see a way to justify notoriety. avs5221 (talk) 01:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since nobody cares. No sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The beauty pageant isn't notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, and the references are exceedingly thin, such as a self-submitted item to a newspaper blog. Jim Heaphy (talk) 05:53, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.